[michax]

Pytanie i odp. dotyczy ogólnie zakończenia, więc dam do spoilera.

Spoiler

The ending, at least as it pertains to the central crime in the show, is a bit ambiguous. Was it always supposed to be that way, or was that a byproduct of the improvisation you mentioned?

The important thing for me was that the character stories are answered. The crime was never the focus of the show for me. It was never a show about crime. It was always a show about musicians and musicians in a particular part of Paris, and it was a story about that part of Paris. And so the important resolution was between Elliot and Julie, and that this was a coming-of-age story for the two of them, and that they were coming into their own and discovering themselves, and ready to be new people and ready to sort themselves out and ready to care about each other and about the band. And that is in the show. The crime plot, we didn't ever want to feel like that dominated things.

And we toyed with doing two action-packed episodes at the end that sort of answered all those questions and turned into lots of people running around, doing all that sort of thing. And it just felt like it wasn't true to the story we were telling. And certainly, as the character develops, and as the show went on, creating those [character arcs] felt more important than answering those sorts of questions or providing that sort of resolution.

Cały wywiad - https://ew.com/tv/the-eddy-ending-explained/