[Rodia]

Na Nolan Fans są na granicy zajebania go. Któryś koleś tam zamieścił ciekawą analizę jego...eee.... techniki krytycznej. Treści następującej:

"I think Armond's review has finally made me come to an understanding of where he is coming from.I don't think he is a troll, he genuinely demands movies to be made according to a set of beliefs which exist in his own mind (in other words films have to agree with his own opinions). Therefore, if a movie is all shades of grey in terms of good and evil, the normal reviewer will admire its complexity, whilst Armond will bash its nihilism. If a movie has a message his own warped mind doesn't agree with (like Toy Story 3) he will bash it. Strangely, despite his clear intelligence, the films he ends up praising are dull and simplistic because they have to fit these stringent guide lines (which seem to be the opposite of what 99% of critics on the planet want out of film - he only wants them to tell him what he already knows because he thinks he knows it all). Egotistical, small minded and irrelevant yes, a troll? No."

Swoją drogą dowiedziałem się stamtąd, że jakoby nowojorscy krytycy nie znoszą Nolana, a to dlatego, że na lokację Gotham w nowych Batmanach wybrał... Chicago a nie NYC I nie wierzyłbym, gdyby nie to, że prawie wszystkie negatywne recki faktycznie są z NY